Being Out of Touch Hurts Your Credibility: A Note About Ed. Tech Coverage

A while back, I read Buckminster Fuller’s little 1962 book Education Automation. It’s a collection of presentations that he gave to scholars and administrators at Southern Illinois University about the future of education.  It is pretty interesting, and includes a neat little prediction about a spherical, visual data stream machine that sounds a lot like the internet.  Fuller had high hopes for the way we could innovate education using science.  But his approach didn’t take off, perhaps because it reads like a treatise on widget production instead of human education.

Of course, the education automation dreams of yesteryear are still around.   Unfortunately, some of today’s education technology pundits seem to be having as hard a time as Fuller understanding the thing they want to transform.

(more…)

Solutions

As a followup to the post about data, ReadWriteWeb had an article on Thursday by Jon Mitchell entitled “Here Are 20 Companies Who Sell Your Data (& How To Stop Them)”.  Good overview information and some solid suggestions for those who want to avoid being a tool.

Seriously!?

“Case in point” regarding the absence of professional ethics in startups and blogging: painful piece entitled “Gangbang Interviews” and “Bikini Shots”: Silicon Valley’s Brogrammer Problem at Mother Jones on sexism in the software industry.

The most telling aspect of these incidents, says veteran Seattle developer Christy Nicol, is that none of the company leaders involved appeared to realize initially that they’d done something wrong. They had simply crafted messages aimed at young men, apparently assuming: Who else would be drawn to programming jobs? “It was the mindset seated deep in the subconscious that programmers are male,” she says.

Or at least that all programmers want to be in on the joke.

A problem being dealt with at big companies, but among startups, not so much.

Wherefore Art Thou, Professional Ethics?

Mathew Ingram had a nice piece over at GigaOm discussing some of this year’s winners of the Pulitzer Prize focused primarily on the fact that prizes are now going to writers who publish online. There is no real difference, he suggests, between bloggers and journalists. Given the success of many software developers at writing and selling software on their own, the same argument could easily be made about the distinction between hobbyist and professional programmer.

Which leaves us in a bit of a situation, professional ethics wise.

(more…)

“Don’t Be a Tool” and Other Friendly Reminders

When I was a kid, I remember people having diaries.  They chronicled their lives writing their innermost thoughts as a way of processing and remembering.  These diaries were hidden away so no one saw them, and sometimes had little locks on them to symbolize the privacy of their contents.  I presume that some people still keep diaries.  I know people who carry journals around and write in them.  But I also know people who chronicle their lives in public via Twitter, blogs, or Facebook. Many people chose to share their more than they used to, and draw the lines between public and private in new ways.

(more…)

Privacy Is About More Than Just Fear

Last week, Josh Constine over at Tech Crunch wrote an interesting piece on online data security. It is a worthwhile read (even if a bit flawed).  His thesis was that innovation is being hampered by public over-reaction to potential problems with the security of private data at social networking sites and in apps. Constine seems frustrated that Despite their own research that showed little danger of data compromise on Facebook apps, The Wall Street Journal still wrote “a hit piece” that warned people about privacy dangers at the site. Privacy concerns are, it seems, a fiction foisted upon an ignorant public by an corrupt media.

(more…)